[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200320125455.GE20696@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 13:54:55 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, arnd@...db.de, balbi@...nel.org,
bhelgaas@...gle.com, bigeasy@...utronix.de, davem@...emloft.net,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, joel@...lfernandes.org,
kurt.schwemmer@...rosemi.com, kvalo@...eaurora.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, logang@...tatee.com,
mingo@...nel.org, mpe@...erman.id.au, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
oleg@...hat.com, paulmck@...nel.org, rdunlap@...radead.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
will@...nel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/15] kvm: Replace vcpu->swait with rcuwait
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 01:55:26AM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> - swait_event_interruptible_exclusive(*wq, ((!vcpu->arch.power_off) &&
> - (!vcpu->arch.pause)));
> + rcuwait_wait_event(*wait,
> + (!vcpu->arch.power_off) && (!vcpu->arch.pause),
> + TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> - for (;;) {
> - prepare_to_swait_exclusive(&vcpu->wq, &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> -
> - if (kvm_vcpu_check_block(vcpu) < 0)
> - break;
> -
> - waited = true;
> - schedule();
> - }
> -
> - finish_swait(&vcpu->wq, &wait);
> + rcuwait_wait_event(&vcpu->wait,
> + (block_check = kvm_vcpu_check_block(vcpu)) < 0,
> + TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
Are these yet more instances that really want to be TASK_IDLE ?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists