[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.2003201101060.27303-100000@netrider.rowland.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 11:03:30 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com>,
Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Daniel Lustig <dlustig@...dia.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Jade Alglave <j.alglave@....ac.uk>,
<linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, Luc Maranget <luc.maranget@...ia.fr>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] LKMM: Add litmus test for RCU GP guarantee where
reader stores
On Fri, 20 Mar 2020, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> This adds an example for the important RCU grace period guarantee, which
> shows an RCU reader can never span a grace period.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@...lfernandes.org>
> ---
> .../litmus-tests/RCU+sync+read.litmus | 37 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/RCU+sync+read.litmus
>
> diff --git a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/RCU+sync+read.litmus b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/RCU+sync+read.litmus
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..73557772e2a32
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/RCU+sync+read.litmus
Do these new tests really belong here? I thought we were adding a new
directory under Documentation/ for litmus tests that illustrate parts
of the LKMM or memory-barriers.txt.
By contrast, the tests under tools/memory-model are merely to show
people what litmus tests look like and how they should be written.
Alan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists