lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 20 Mar 2020 10:58:43 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>
Cc:     Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
        Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@...com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        linux- stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/48] 4.19.112-rc1 review

On 3/20/20 1:11 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 09:03:17AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 08:00:32PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2020-03-20 at 01:12 +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 19 Mar 2020 at 18:50, Greg Kroah-Hartman
>>>> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.112 release.
>>>>> There are 48 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>>>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>>>> let me know.
>>>>>
>>>>> Responses should be made by Sat, 21 Mar 2020 12:37:04 +0000.
>>>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>>>
>>>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>>>>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.19.112-rc1.gz
>>>>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>>>>>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.19.y
>>>>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> greg k-h
>>>>>
>>>>> Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@...com>
>>>>>     mmc: sdhci-omap: Fix Tuning procedure for temperatures < -20C
>>>>>
>>>>> Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@...com>
>>>>>     mmc: sdhci-omap: Don't finish_mrq() on a command error during tuning
>>>>
>>>> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
>>>> No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
>>>>
>>>> NOTE:
>>>> The arm beagleboard x15 device running stable rc 4.19.112-rc1, 5.4.27-rc1
>>>> and 5.5.11-rc2 kernel pops up the following messages on console log,
>>>> Is this a problem ?
>>>>
>>>> [   15.737765] mmc1: unspecified timeout for CMD6 - use generic
>>>> [   16.754248] mmc1: unspecified timeout for CMD6 - use generic
>>>> [   16.842071] mmc1: unspecified timeout for CMD6 - use generic
>>>> ...
>>>> [  977.126652] mmc1: unspecified timeout for CMD6 - use generic
>>>> [  985.449798] mmc1: unspecified timeout for CMD6 - use generic
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> This warning was introduced by commit 533a6cfe08f9 "mmc: core: Default
>>> to generic_cmd6_time as timeout in __mmc_switch()".  That should not be
>>> applied to stable branches; it is not valid without (at least) these
>>> preparatory changes:
>>>
>>> 0c204979c691 mmc: core: Cleanup BKOPS support
>>> 24ed3bd01d6a mmc: core: Specify timeouts for BKOPS and CACHE_FLUSH for eMMC
>>> ad91619aa9d7 mmc: block: Use generic_cmd6_time when modifying INAND_CMD38_ARG_EXT_CSD
>>
>> Ok, I've now dropped that patch, which also required me to drop
>> 1292e3efb149 ("mmc: core: Allow host controllers to require R1B for
>> CMD6").  I've done so for 5.5.y, 5.4.y, and 4.19.y.
> 
> Ugh, I forgot, that broke other things.  I'm going to go rip out a bunch
> of mmc patches now...
> 
For v4.19.111-44-gd078cac:

Build results:
	total: 156 pass: 156 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
	total: 418 pass: 418 fail: 0

Guenter

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ