[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <04164e5e-8cec-54cd-c4bd-f72bba86b5da@roeck-us.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 10:58:43 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>
Cc: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@...com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, patches@...nelci.org,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
linux- stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/48] 4.19.112-rc1 review
On 3/20/20 1:11 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 09:03:17AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 08:00:32PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2020-03-20 at 01:12 +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 19 Mar 2020 at 18:50, Greg Kroah-Hartman
>>>> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.112 release.
>>>>> There are 48 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>>>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>>>> let me know.
>>>>>
>>>>> Responses should be made by Sat, 21 Mar 2020 12:37:04 +0000.
>>>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>>>
>>>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>>>> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.19.112-rc1.gz
>>>>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>>>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.19.y
>>>>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> greg k-h
>>>>>
>>>>> Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@...com>
>>>>> mmc: sdhci-omap: Fix Tuning procedure for temperatures < -20C
>>>>>
>>>>> Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@...com>
>>>>> mmc: sdhci-omap: Don't finish_mrq() on a command error during tuning
>>>>
>>>> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
>>>> No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
>>>>
>>>> NOTE:
>>>> The arm beagleboard x15 device running stable rc 4.19.112-rc1, 5.4.27-rc1
>>>> and 5.5.11-rc2 kernel pops up the following messages on console log,
>>>> Is this a problem ?
>>>>
>>>> [ 15.737765] mmc1: unspecified timeout for CMD6 - use generic
>>>> [ 16.754248] mmc1: unspecified timeout for CMD6 - use generic
>>>> [ 16.842071] mmc1: unspecified timeout for CMD6 - use generic
>>>> ...
>>>> [ 977.126652] mmc1: unspecified timeout for CMD6 - use generic
>>>> [ 985.449798] mmc1: unspecified timeout for CMD6 - use generic
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> This warning was introduced by commit 533a6cfe08f9 "mmc: core: Default
>>> to generic_cmd6_time as timeout in __mmc_switch()". That should not be
>>> applied to stable branches; it is not valid without (at least) these
>>> preparatory changes:
>>>
>>> 0c204979c691 mmc: core: Cleanup BKOPS support
>>> 24ed3bd01d6a mmc: core: Specify timeouts for BKOPS and CACHE_FLUSH for eMMC
>>> ad91619aa9d7 mmc: block: Use generic_cmd6_time when modifying INAND_CMD38_ARG_EXT_CSD
>>
>> Ok, I've now dropped that patch, which also required me to drop
>> 1292e3efb149 ("mmc: core: Allow host controllers to require R1B for
>> CMD6"). I've done so for 5.5.y, 5.4.y, and 4.19.y.
>
> Ugh, I forgot, that broke other things. I'm going to go rip out a bunch
> of mmc patches now...
>
For v4.19.111-44-gd078cac:
Build results:
total: 156 pass: 156 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 418 pass: 418 fail: 0
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists