linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf/cgroup: correct indirection in perf_less_group

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 21 Mar 2020 09:47:41 -0700
From:   Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/cgroup: correct indirection in perf_less_group_idx

On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 6:25 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 06:38:39PM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > The void* in perf_less_group_idx is to a cell in the array which points
> > at a perf_event*, as such it is a perf_event**.
> >
> > Fixes: 6eef8a7116de ("perf/core: Use min_heap in visit_groups_merge()")
> > Author: John Sperbeck <jsperbeck@...gle.com>
>
> That doesn't make sense, did he write the patch? Then there needs to be
> a From: him and a SoB: him, If he reported the issue, it should be
> Reported-by: him.

Done.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/21/295

> > Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
> > ---
> >  kernel/events/core.c | 3 ++-
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
> > index d22e4ba59dfa..a758c2311c53 100644
> > --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> > +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> > @@ -3503,7 +3503,8 @@ static void cpu_ctx_sched_out(struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx,
> >
> >  static bool perf_less_group_idx(const void *l, const void *r)
> >  {
> > -     const struct perf_event *le = l, *re = r;
> > +     const struct perf_event *le = *(const struct perf_event **)l;
> > +     const struct perf_event *re = *(const struct perf_event **)r;
>
> How did this not insta explode?

Agreed, a cgroup depth of at least 3 is needed for a heap allocation
and we saw this with kasan. CONFIG_KASAN_STACK should have been able
to catch this in the normal case.

Thanks,
Ian