lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6175728c63483acc80cf36f40e17fa5bac18d545.camel@analog.com>
Date:   Sun, 22 Mar 2020 09:09:10 +0000
From:   "Ardelean, Alexandru" <alexandru.Ardelean@...log.com>
To:     "andy.shevchenko@...il.com" <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        "joe@...ches.com" <joe@...ches.com>
CC:     "andriy.shevchenko@...el.com" <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>,
        "linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com" <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
        "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "ardeleanalex@...il.com" <ardeleanalex@...il.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "torvalds@...ux-foundation.org" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "jic23@...nel.org" <jic23@...nel.org>,
        "Hennerich, Michael" <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: remove Stefan Popa's email

On Sat, 2020-03-21 at 22:18 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> [External]
> 
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 10:11 PM Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> > On Sat, 2020-03-21 at 21:48 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 04:33:36PM +0200, Alexandru Ardelean wrote:
> > > > The email is no longer active. This change removes Stefan's email from
> > > > the
> > > > MAINTAINERS list and replaces it with Michael Hennerich's.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Are you planning to fix entries as parse-maintainers.pl does?
> > > (Maybe in a separate change, but also why not here)
> > 
> > I think perhaps you should not ask people to use parse-maintainers
> > on specific sections anymore as it's rather confusing to use and
> > it's best done as a one-shot by Linus one day.  I hope soon.
> 
> Why not? The benefits are
>  - people will know about the tool
>  - the particular sections will be fixed since they are touching the data base
> 
> And it doesn't prevent Linus or anybody to run the script in the future.
> 
> Actually it will teach people ahead to use the tool then in the future
> we won't see such drastic deviation in ordering.
> 

i guess this means it's a noop for me now

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ