[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200322153659.GO11481@lunn.ch>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 16:36:59 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Dejin Zheng <zhengdejin5@...il.com>
Cc: f.fainelli@...il.com, hkallweit1@...il.com, linux@...linux.org.uk,
davem@...emloft.net, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
broonie@...nel.org, alexios.zavras@...el.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
mchehab+samsung@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 6/9] net: phy: marvell10g: use
phy_read_mmd_poll_timeout() to simplify the code
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/marvell10g.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/marvell10g.c
> @@ -241,22 +241,17 @@ static int mv3310_power_up(struct phy_device *phydev)
>
> static int mv3310_reset(struct phy_device *phydev, u32 unit)
> {
> - int retries, val, err;
> + int val, err;
>
> err = phy_modify_mmd(phydev, MDIO_MMD_PCS, unit + MDIO_CTRL1,
> MDIO_CTRL1_RESET, MDIO_CTRL1_RESET);
> if (err < 0)
> return err;
>
> - retries = 20;
> - do {
> - msleep(5);
> - val = phy_read_mmd(phydev, MDIO_MMD_PCS, unit + MDIO_CTRL1);
> - if (val < 0)
> - return val;
> - } while (val & MDIO_CTRL1_RESET && --retries);
This is another example of the sleep happening first. To keep the code
more similar, you probably should add an msleep(5) before calling
phy_read_mmd_poll_timeout().
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists