[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200322161814.GA20189@nuc8i5>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 00:18:14 +0800
From: Dejin Zheng <zhengdejin5@...il.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: f.fainelli@...il.com, hkallweit1@...il.com, linux@...linux.org.uk,
davem@...emloft.net, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
broonie@...nel.org, alexios.zavras@...el.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
mchehab+samsung@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 6/9] net: phy: marvell10g: use
phy_read_mmd_poll_timeout() to simplify the code
On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 04:36:59PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > --- a/drivers/net/phy/marvell10g.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/phy/marvell10g.c
> > @@ -241,22 +241,17 @@ static int mv3310_power_up(struct phy_device *phydev)
> >
> > static int mv3310_reset(struct phy_device *phydev, u32 unit)
> > {
> > - int retries, val, err;
> > + int val, err;
> >
> > err = phy_modify_mmd(phydev, MDIO_MMD_PCS, unit + MDIO_CTRL1,
> > MDIO_CTRL1_RESET, MDIO_CTRL1_RESET);
> > if (err < 0)
> > return err;
> >
> > - retries = 20;
> > - do {
> > - msleep(5);
> > - val = phy_read_mmd(phydev, MDIO_MMD_PCS, unit + MDIO_CTRL1);
> > - if (val < 0)
> > - return val;
> > - } while (val & MDIO_CTRL1_RESET && --retries);
>
> This is another example of the sleep happening first. To keep the code
> more similar, you probably should add an msleep(5) before calling
> phy_read_mmd_poll_timeout().
>
> Andrew
Andrew, you're right, do it right away. Thank you for helping me so
patiently!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists