[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALvZod4GjRFLRX=S_YFYnJk-kL6tjveYEDOBFS76NqrURERHHQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 09:31:04 -0700
From: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
To: Rafael Aquini <aquini@...hat.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, shuah@...nel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools/testing/selftests/vm/mlock2-tests: fix mlock2
false-negative errors
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 6:35 PM Rafael Aquini <aquini@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Changes for commit 9c4e6b1a7027f ("mm, mlock, vmscan: no more skipping pagevecs")
> break this test expectations on the behavior of mlock syscall family immediately
> inserting the recently faulted pages into the UNEVICTABLE_LRU, when MCL_ONFAULT is
> passed to the syscall as part of its flag-set.
mlock* syscalls do not provide any guarantee that the pages will be in
unevictable LRU, only that the pages will not be paged-out. The test
is checking something very internal to the kernel and this is expected
to break.
>
> There is no functional error introduced by the aforementioned commit,
> but it opens up a time window where the recently faulted and locked pages
> might yet not be put back into the UNEVICTABLE_LRU, thus causing a
> subsequent and immediate PFN flag check for the UNEVICTABLE bit
> to trip on false-negative errors, as it happens with this test.
>
> This patch fix the false negative by forcefully resorting to a code path that
> will call a CPU pagevec drain right after the fault but before the PFN flag
> check takes place, sorting out the race that way.
>
> Fixes: 9c4e6b1a7027f ("mm, mlock, vmscan: no more skipping pagevecs")
This is fixing the actual test and not about fixing the mentioned
patch. So, this Fixes line is not needed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists