[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200323135110.30522-5-qais.yousef@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 13:50:57 +0000
From: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 04/17] arm: Don't use disable_nonboot_cpus()
disable_nonboot_cpus() is not safe to use when doing machine_down(),
because it relies on freeze_secondary_cpus() which in turn is
a suspend/resume related freeze and could abort if the logic detects any
pending activities that can prevent finishing the offlining process.
Beside disable_nonboot_cpus() is dependent on CONFIG_PM_SLEEP_SMP which
is an othogonal config to rely on to ensure this function works
correctly.
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>
CC: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
CC: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
---
arch/arm/kernel/reboot.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/reboot.c b/arch/arm/kernel/reboot.c
index bb18ed0539f4..58ad1a70f770 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/reboot.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/reboot.c
@@ -88,11 +88,11 @@ void soft_restart(unsigned long addr)
* to execute e.g. a RAM-based pin loop is not sufficient. This allows the
* kexec'd kernel to use any and all RAM as it sees fit, without having to
* avoid any code or data used by any SW CPU pin loop. The CPU hotplug
- * functionality embodied in disable_nonboot_cpus() to achieve this.
+ * functionality embodied in smp_shutdown_nonboot_cpus() to achieve this.
*/
void machine_shutdown(void)
{
- disable_nonboot_cpus();
+ smp_shutdown_nonboot_cpus(0);
}
/*
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists