[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200323135320.GJ2452@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 14:53:20 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] lockdep/irq: Be more strict about IRQ-threadable
code end
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 04:32:05AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> --- a/kernel/irq/handle.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/handle.c
> @@ -144,18 +144,24 @@ irqreturn_t __handle_irq_event_percpu(struct irq_desc *desc, unsigned int *flags
>
> for_each_action_of_desc(desc, action) {
> irqreturn_t res;
> + bool threadable;
>
> /*
> * If this IRQ would be threaded under force_irqthreads, mark it so.
> */
> - if (irq_settings_can_thread(desc) &&
> - !(action->flags & (IRQF_NO_THREAD | IRQF_PERCPU | IRQF_ONESHOT)))
> + threadable = (irq_settings_can_thread(desc) &&
> + !(action->flags & (IRQF_NO_THREAD | IRQF_PERCPU | IRQF_ONESHOT)));
> +
> + if (threadable)
> trace_hardirq_threaded();
>
> trace_irq_handler_entry(irq, action);
> res = action->handler(irq, action->dev_id);
> trace_irq_handler_exit(irq, action, res);
>
> + if (threadable)
> + trace_hardirq_unthreaded();
AFAICT this doesn't work for nested IRQ handlers.
> if (WARN_ONCE(!irqs_disabled(),"irq %u handler %pS enabled interrupts\n",
> irq, action->handler))
> local_irq_disable();
> --
> 2.25.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists