[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200323150007.7487-2-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 15:00:03 +0000
From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
To: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Freeman Liu <freeman.liu@...soc.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@...il.com>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] nvmem: sprd: Fix the block lock operation
From: Freeman Liu <freeman.liu@...soc.com>
According to the Spreadtrum eFuse specification, we should write 0 to
the block to trigger the lock operation.
Fixes: 096030e7f449 ("nvmem: sprd: Add Spreadtrum SoCs eFuse support")
Signed-off-by: Freeman Liu <freeman.liu@...soc.com>
Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
---
drivers/nvmem/sprd-efuse.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/sprd-efuse.c b/drivers/nvmem/sprd-efuse.c
index 2f1e0fbd1901..7a189ef52333 100644
--- a/drivers/nvmem/sprd-efuse.c
+++ b/drivers/nvmem/sprd-efuse.c
@@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ static int sprd_efuse_raw_prog(struct sprd_efuse *efuse, u32 blk, bool doub,
ret = -EBUSY;
} else {
sprd_efuse_set_prog_lock(efuse, lock);
- writel(*data, efuse->base + SPRD_EFUSE_MEM(blk));
+ writel(0, efuse->base + SPRD_EFUSE_MEM(blk));
sprd_efuse_set_prog_lock(efuse, false);
}
--
2.21.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists