[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <af285c22-2a3f-5aa6-3fdb-27fba73389bd@windriver.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 11:02:37 -0600
From: Chris Friesen <chris.friesen@...driver.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, Vu Tran <vu.tran@...driver.com>,
Jim Somerville <Jim.Somerville@...driver.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] affine kernel threads to specified cpumask
On 3/23/2020 10:22 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Marcelo,
> Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com> writes:
>
> the subject lacks a prefix and the CC list a few people.
>
>> This is a kernel enhancement to configure the cpu affinity of kernel
>> threads via kernel boot option kthread_cpus=<cpulist>.
>>
>> With kthread_cpus specified, the cpumask is immediately applied upon
>> thread launch. This does not affect kernel threads that specify cpu
>> and node.
>>
>> This allows CPU isolation (that is not allowing certain threads
>> to execute on certain CPUs) without using the isolcpus= parameter,
>> making it possible to enable load balancing on such CPUs
>> during runtime.
>
> I'm surely missing some background information, but that sentence does
> not make any sense to me.
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
>
The idea is to affine general kernel threads to specific "housekeeping"
CPUs, while still allowing load balancing of tasks.
The isolcpus= boot parameter would prevent kernel threads from running
on the isolated CPUs, but it disables load balancing on the isolated CPUs.
Chris
Powered by blists - more mailing lists