[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_Jsq+rzaFLvZGX+dpgGhfCSsAvj06T8fcgo83m+ZJGboKsnQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 11:59:17 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
To: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>,
Marc Gonzalez <marc.w.gonzalez@...e.fr>,
Mans Rullgard <mans@...sr.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"open list:SERIAL DRIVERS" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] powerpc/fsl: Make serial ports compatible with ns16550a
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 11:41 AM Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk> wrote:
>
> There are separate compatible strings for ns16550 and ns16550a and the
> Freescale serial port is compatible with the latter one, with working
> FIFO.
I don't think changing this is right. First, 'ns16550' is what's
documented in the DT spec (and ePAPR which it's based on).
Second, these dts files are pretty mature/stable, so I'm less inclined
to change them. AFAICT, this change either enables the fifo (which
would be an untested change in behavior) or has no effect because the
fifo is auto-detected.
> Use the appropriate compatible string that is also consistent with ARM64
> Freescale boards and thus avoiding one special case in the binding schema.
Well, that's annoying...
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists