[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <61c8c11d-2aa8-cb6e-9e7a-99aea94d78b9@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 20:22:30 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Dejin Zheng <zhengdejin5@...il.com>, andrew@...n.ch,
hkallweit1@...il.com, linux@...linux.org.uk, davem@...emloft.net,
mchehab+samsung@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
broonie@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 08/10] net: phy: use phy_read_poll_timeout()
to simplify the code
On 3/22/2020 7:56 PM, Dejin Zheng wrote:
> use phy_read_poll_timeout() to replace the poll codes for
> simplify the code in phy_poll_reset() function.
>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
> Signed-off-by: Dejin Zheng <zhengdejin5@...il.com>
> ---
> v5 -> v6:
> - add some check for keep the code more similar.
> v4 -> v5:
> - it can add msleep before call phy_read_poll_timeout()
> to keep the code more similar. so add it.
> v3 -> v4:
> - drop it.
> v2 -> v3:
> - adapt to it after modifying the parameter order of the
> newly added function
> v1 -> v2:
> - remove the handle of phy_read()'s return error.
>
> drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c | 17 ++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
> index a585faf8b844..eb1b177a9878 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
> @@ -1059,18 +1059,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(phy_disconnect);
> static int phy_poll_reset(struct phy_device *phydev)
> {
> /* Poll until the reset bit clears (50ms per retry == 0.6 sec) */
> - unsigned int retries = 12;
> - int ret;
> -
> - do {
> - msleep(50);
> - ret = phy_read(phydev, MII_BMCR);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> - } while (ret & BMCR_RESET && --retries);
> - if (ret & BMCR_RESET)
> - return -ETIMEDOUT;
> + int ret, val;
>
> + msleep(50);
> + ret = phy_read_poll_timeout(phydev, MII_BMCR, val, !(val & BMCR_RESET),
> + 50000, 550000);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
You may consider creating a special variant of phy_read_poll_timeout()
which sleeps before checking the condition, since there are at least two
occurrences of this here and within marvell10g.c?
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists