[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <57C56801-7F3B-478A-83E9-1D2376C60666@holtmann.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 19:48:39 +0100
From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Miao-chen Chou <mcchou@...omium.org>,
Bluetooth Kernel Mailing List
<linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org>,
Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@...el.com>,
Alain Michaud <alainm@...omium.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] Bluetooth: btusb: Indicate Microsoft vendor
extension for Intel 9460/9560 and 9160/9260
Hi Joe,
>>> This adds a bit mask of driver_info for Microsoft vendor extension and
>>> indicates the support for Intel 9460/9560 and 9160/9260. See
>>> https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/bluetooth/
>>> microsoft-defined-bluetooth-hci-commands-and-events for more information
>>> about the extension. This was verified with Intel ThunderPeak BT controller
>>> where msft_vnd_ext_opcode is 0xFC1E.
> []
>>> diff --git a/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h b/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h
> []
>>> @@ -315,6 +315,10 @@ struct hci_dev {
>>> __u8 ssp_debug_mode;
>>> __u8 hw_error_code;
>>> __u32 clock;
>>> + __u16 msft_vnd_ext_opcode;
>>> + __u64 msft_vnd_ext_features;
>>> + __u8 msft_vnd_ext_evt_prefix_len;
>>> + void *msft_vnd_ext_evt_prefix;
>
> msft is just another vendor.
>
> If there are to be vendor extensions, this should
> likely use a blank line above and below and not
> be prefixed with msft_
there are other vendors, but all of them are different. So this needs to be prefixed with msft_ actually. But I agree that having empty lines above and below makes it more readable.
Regards
Marcel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists