linux-kernel - Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference in handle_external_interrupt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <887add8e-cc74-b50b-46f8-f51d39c12dff@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 23 Mar 2020 20:39:58 +0100
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>
Cc:     Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        syzbot <syzbot+3f29ca2efb056a761e38@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
        clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        syzkaller-bugs <syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
Subject: Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference in
 handle_external_interrupt_irqoff

On 23/03/20 20:30, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> <ndesaulniers@...gle.com> wrote:
>> So maybe we can find why
>> commit 76b043848fd2 ("x86/retpoline: Add initial retpoline support")
>> added THUNK_TARGET with and without "m" constraint, and either:
>> - remove "m" from THUNK_TARGET. (Maybe this doesn't compile somewhere)
>> or
>> - use my above recommendation locally avoiding THUNK_TARGET.  We can
>> use "r" rather than "a" (what Clang would have picked) or "b (what GCC
>> would have picked) to give the compilers maximal flexibility.
> So I've sent a patch for the latter; my reason for not pursuing the former is:
> 1. I assume that the thunk target could be spilled, or a pointer, and
> we'd like to keep flexibility for the general case of inline asm that
> doesn't modify the stack pointer.
> 2. `entry` is local to `handle_external_interrupt_irqoff`; it's not
> being passed in via pointer as a function parameter.
> 3. register pressure is irrelevant if the resulting code is incorrect.

Yes, this is fair enough.  I've queued your patch and will send it
shortly to Linus.

Paolo