linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: sound: convert rockchip spdif bindings to yaml

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 24 Mar 2020 14:41:45 +0100
From:   Johan Jonker <jbx6244@...il.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     lgirdwood@...il.com, heiko@...ech.de, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: sound: convert rockchip spdif
 bindings to yaml

Hi Mark,

Today I send 2 sets. One for I2S and one for SPDIF.
'power-domains' is added in respons to robh answer to rockchip,vop.txt
conversion.

>> Hi,
>>
>> Question for robh:
>>
>> In the old txt situation we add/describe only properties that are used
>> by the driver/hardware itself. With yaml it also filters things in a
>> node that are used by other drivers like:
>>
>> assigned-clocks:
>> assigned-clock-rates:
>> power-domains:
>>
>> Should we add or not?
> 
> Yes, only pinctrl properties are automatically added.
> 
> We could change 'assigned-clocks', but for now I think they should be 
> added.
> 
> Rob


On 3/24/20 2:35 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 01:31:53PM +0100, Johan Jonker wrote:
>> Current dts files with 'spdif' nodes are manually verified.
>> In order to automate this process rockchip-spdif.txt
>> has to be converted to yaml.
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@...il.com>
>> ---
>> Changed V2:
>>   dmas and dma-names layout
> 
> This is the second v2 you've sent of this today - it adds these but
> drops Rob's ack?
>