lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200324153643.15527-19-will@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:36:40 +0000
From:   Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Maddie Stone <maddiestone@...gle.com>,
        Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
        "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, kernel-team@...roid.com,
        kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: [RFC PATCH 18/21] list_bl: Move integrity checking out of line

In preparation for adding full integrity checking to 'hlist_bl', move
the checks out of line before they become more bloated. At the same,
swap the argument order for __hlist_bl_add_head_valid() so that it
follows the same convention as __hlist_add_head_valid().

Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
---
 include/linux/list_bl.h    | 34 ++++++----------------------------
 include/linux/rculist_bl.h |  2 +-
 lib/list_debug.c           | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/list_bl.h b/include/linux/list_bl.h
index 0839c4f43e6d..dd74043ebae6 100644
--- a/include/linux/list_bl.h
+++ b/include/linux/list_bl.h
@@ -33,34 +33,12 @@ struct hlist_bl_node {
 };
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_CHECK_INTEGRITY_LIST
-static inline bool __hlist_bl_add_head_valid(struct hlist_bl_head *h,
-					     struct hlist_bl_node *n)
-{
-	unsigned long hlock = (unsigned long)h->first & LIST_BL_LOCKMASK;
-	unsigned long nlock = (unsigned long)n & LIST_BL_LOCKMASK;
-
-	return !(CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(nlock,
-			"hlist_bl_add_head: node is locked\n") ||
-		 CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(hlock != LIST_BL_LOCKMASK,
-			"hlist_bl_add_head: head is unlocked\n"));
-}
-
-static inline bool __hlist_bl_del_valid(struct hlist_bl_node *n)
-{
-	unsigned long nlock = (unsigned long)n & LIST_BL_LOCKMASK;
-
-	return !(CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(nlock,
-			"hlist_bl_del_valid: node locked") ||
-		 CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(n->next == LIST_POISON1,
-			"hlist_bl_del corruption, %px->next is LIST_POISON1 (%px)\n",
-			n, LIST_POISON1) ||
-		 CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(n->pprev == LIST_POISON2,
-			"hlist_bl_del corruption, %px->pprev is LIST_POISON2 (%px)\n",
-			n, LIST_POISON2));
-}
+extern bool __hlist_bl_add_head_valid(struct hlist_bl_node *n,
+				      struct hlist_bl_head *h);
+extern bool __hlist_bl_del_valid(struct hlist_bl_node *node);
 #else
-static inline bool __hlist_bl_add_head_valid(struct hlist_bl_head *h,
-					     struct hlist_bl_node *n)
+static inline bool __hlist_bl_add_head_valid(struct hlist_bl_node *n,
+					     struct hlist_bl_head *h)
 {
 	return true;
 }
@@ -103,7 +81,7 @@ static inline void hlist_bl_add_head(struct hlist_bl_node *n,
 {
 	struct hlist_bl_node *first = hlist_bl_first(h);
 
-	if (!__hlist_bl_add_head_valid(h, n))
+	if (!__hlist_bl_add_head_valid(n, h))
 		return;
 
 	n->next = first;
diff --git a/include/linux/rculist_bl.h b/include/linux/rculist_bl.h
index 553ce3cde104..9356e7283ff0 100644
--- a/include/linux/rculist_bl.h
+++ b/include/linux/rculist_bl.h
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static inline void hlist_bl_add_head_rcu(struct hlist_bl_node *n,
 {
 	struct hlist_bl_node *first;
 
-	if (!__hlist_bl_add_head_valid(h, n))
+	if (!__hlist_bl_add_head_valid(n, h))
 		return;
 
 	/* don't need hlist_bl_first_rcu because we're under lock */
diff --git a/lib/list_debug.c b/lib/list_debug.c
index b3560de4accc..9591fa6c9337 100644
--- a/lib/list_debug.c
+++ b/lib/list_debug.c
@@ -186,3 +186,31 @@ bool __hlist_nulls_del_valid(struct hlist_nulls_node *node)
 	return true;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__hlist_nulls_del_valid);
+
+bool __hlist_bl_add_head_valid(struct hlist_bl_node *new,
+			       struct hlist_bl_head *head)
+{
+	unsigned long hlock = (unsigned long)head->first & LIST_BL_LOCKMASK;
+	unsigned long nlock = (unsigned long)new & LIST_BL_LOCKMASK;
+
+	return !(CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(nlock,
+			"hlist_bl_add_head: node is locked\n") ||
+		 CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(hlock != LIST_BL_LOCKMASK,
+			"hlist_bl_add_head: head is unlocked\n"));
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__hlist_bl_add_head_valid);
+
+bool __hlist_bl_del_valid(struct hlist_bl_node *node)
+{
+	unsigned long nlock = (unsigned long)node & LIST_BL_LOCKMASK;
+
+	return !(CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(nlock,
+			"hlist_bl_del_valid: node locked") ||
+		 CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(node->next == LIST_POISON1,
+			"hlist_bl_del corruption, %px->next is LIST_POISON1 (%px)\n",
+			node, LIST_POISON1) ||
+		 CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(node->pprev == LIST_POISON2,
+			"hlist_bl_del corruption, %px->pprev is LIST_POISON2 (%px)\n",
+			node, LIST_POISON2));
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__hlist_bl_del_valid);
-- 
2.20.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ