linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Documentation/changes: Raise minimum supported binutils version to 2.23

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200324162843.GE22931@zn.tnic>
Date:   Tue, 24 Mar 2020 17:28:43 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
Cc:     Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Lendacky <Thomas.Lendacky@....com>,
        Mauro Rossi <issor.oruam@...il.com>,
        Michael Matz <matz@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/changes: Raise minimum supported binutils
 version to 2.23

On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 10:22:53AM -0600, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Both Kees and I were pretty positive yesterday about getting this done
> in 5.7, now.

Are you or Kees going to deal with any fallout from upping the binutils
version, rushed in in the last week before the merge window?

Because I sure as hell am not. *Especially* if there's no big difference
when it goes in.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette