[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHmME9pV93Zey2=XghxzThTHbZarFrnxwnGatXHyQjevPf7R=g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 11:17:02 -0600
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
To: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"open list:HARDWARE RANDOM NUMBER GENERATOR CORE"
<linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/16] x86: probe assembler capabilities via kconfig
instead of makefile
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 11:01 AM Nick Desaulniers
<ndesaulniers@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> Can 11 just be rebased with 8 dropped?
8 adds comments to one place. 11 moves them to another place, while
doing other things.
Your desire is to skip the first step? I guess there's no problem with
this, but I'm curious to learn why.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists