[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200324174735.GC5998@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 10:47:35 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
To: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
hpa@...or.com, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] x86/split_lock: Fix and virtualization of split
lock detection
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 11:18:51PM +0800, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
> So sorry for the noise that I forgot to CC the maillist.
You also forgot to add RESEND :-) Tagging the patches like so
[PATCH RESEND v6 0/8] x86/split_lock: Fix and virtualization of split lock detection
lets folks that received the originals identify and respond to the "new"
thread.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists