linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 00/11] Modernize Loongson64 Machine v6

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200324180718.GB8911@alpha.franken.de>
Date:   Tue, 24 Mar 2020 19:07:18 +0100
From:   Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
To:     Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>
Cc:     Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Huacai Chen <chenhc@...ote.com>,
        Allison Randal <allison@...utok.net>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/11] Modernize Loongson64 Machine v6

On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 11:51:18PM +0800, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
> >How do you want to get these merged? I can take the first 6 patches
> >through the irqchip tree, and leave the rest to go via the MIPS tree.
> >
> >Otherwise, if you plan to have the whole thing go via the MIPS tree,
> >please add my:
> >
> >Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
> >
> >to patches 1, 2, 4 and 6.
> >
> >Please let me know quickly, as I'd like to close the irqchip tree
> >tomorrow.
> 
> I'd prefer all go through MIPS tree.
> 
> Thomas, could you please help with that?

I'm fine taking them. Could you please add Signed-offs from your
co-developer and look at the remaining checkpatch warnings ?

Thomas.

-- 
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea.                                                [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]