[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGETcx8Qhy3y66vJyi8kRvg1+hXf-goDvyty-bsG5qFrA-CKgg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 11:34:20 -0700
From: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
To: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@....com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org, x86 <x86@...nel.org>,
liviu.dudau@....com, sudeep.holla@....com,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
Subject: Re: [tip: timers/core] clocksource/drivers/timer-probe: Avoid
creating dead devices
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 11:00 AM Ionela Voinescu
<ionela.voinescu@....com> wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> On Thursday 19 Mar 2020 at 08:47:46 (-0000), tip-bot2 for Saravana Kannan wrote:
> > The following commit has been merged into the timers/core branch of tip:
> >
> > Commit-ID: 4f41fe386a94639cd9a1831298d4f85db5662f1e
> > Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/4f41fe386a94639cd9a1831298d4f85db5662f1e
> > Author: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
> > AuthorDate: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 21:21:25 -08:00
> > Committer: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
> > CommitterDate: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 13:10:07 +01:00
> >
> > clocksource/drivers/timer-probe: Avoid creating dead devices
> >
> > Timer initialization is done during early boot way before the driver
> > core starts processing devices and drivers. Timers initialized during
> > this early boot period don't really need or use a struct device.
> >
> > However, for timers represented as device tree nodes, the struct devices
> > are still created and sit around unused and wasting memory. This change
> > avoid this by marking the device tree nodes as "populated" if the
> > corresponding timer is successfully initialized.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200111052125.238212-1-saravanak@google.com
> > ---
> > drivers/clocksource/timer-probe.c | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/timer-probe.c b/drivers/clocksource/timer-probe.c
> > index ee9574d..a10f28d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-probe.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-probe.c
> > @@ -27,8 +27,10 @@ void __init timer_probe(void)
> >
> > init_func_ret = match->data;
> >
> > + of_node_set_flag(np, OF_POPULATED);
> > ret = init_func_ret(np);
> > if (ret) {
> > + of_node_clear_flag(np, OF_POPULATED);
> > if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > pr_err("Failed to initialize '%pOF': %d\n", np,
> > ret);
> >
>
> This patch is creating problems on some vexpress platforms - ones that
> are using CLKSRC_VERSATILE (drivers/clocksource/timer-versatile.c).
> I noticed issues on TC2 and FVPs (fixed virtual platforms) starting with
> next-20200318 and still reproducible with next-20200323.
>
> It seems the issue this patch causes on TC2 and FVP is related to the
> vexpress-sysreg node being used early for sched_clock_init
> (timer_versatile.c: versatile_sched_clock_init). At this point (at
> time_init) the node will be marked as OF_POPULATED, which flags that a
> device is already created for it, but it is not, in this case.
>
> Later at sysreg_init (vexpress-sysreg.c) a device will fail to be created
> for it, as one already exists. This will result in a failure to create a
> bridge and a system controller for a bunch of devices (mostly clocks and
> regulators).
>
> I think on the FVP it does not cause many issues as clocks are fixed and
> regulator settings are probably nops so it boots fine and throws only
> some warnings. On TC2 on the other hand it fails to boot and it hangs at
> starting the kernel.
>
> In my opinion the idea of the patch is not bad, but I'm not an expert on
> this so the most I can offer for now is the basic understanding of the
> issue. I've Cc-ed a few folks to potentially suggest alternatives/fixes.
>
> For now, reverting this patch solves the problems on both platforms.
> I tested this on next-20200318 which introduced the problem.
I'll reply later today after I take a closer look. But will something
like what timer-ingenic.c did work for you? You can clear the flag
inside your early init.
-Saravana
>
> Hope it helps,
> Ionela.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists