| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 14:07:57 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] media: dt-bindings: media: i2c: convert ov5645
bindings to json-schema
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 5:02 PM Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 04:48:36PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 05:10:35PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 12:19:23PM +0000, Lad Prabhakar wrote:
> > > > Convert ov5645 bindings to json-schema.
> > >
> > > \o/
> > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > .../devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ov5645.txt | 54 -------
> > > > .../devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ov5645.yaml | 140 ++++++++++++++++++
> > > > 2 files changed, 140 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
> > > > delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ov5645.txt
> > > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ov5645.yaml
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ov5645.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ov5645.txt
> > > > deleted file mode 100644
> > > > index 1c85c78ec58c..000000000000
> > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ov5645.txt
> > > > +++ /dev/null
> > > > @@ -1,54 +0,0 @@
> > > > -* Omnivision 1/4-Inch 5Mp CMOS Digital Image Sensor
> > > > -
> > > > -The Omnivision OV5645 is a 1/4-Inch CMOS active pixel digital image sensor with
> > > > -an active array size of 2592H x 1944V. It is programmable through a serial I2C
> > > > -interface.
> > > > -
> > > > -Required Properties:
> > > > -- compatible: Value should be "ovti,ov5645".
> > > > -- clocks: Reference to the xclk clock.
> > > > -- clock-names: Should be "xclk".
> > > > -- enable-gpios: Chip enable GPIO. Polarity is GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH. This corresponds
> > > > - to the hardware pin PWDNB which is physically active low.
> > > > -- reset-gpios: Chip reset GPIO. Polarity is GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW. This corresponds to
> > > > - the hardware pin RESETB.
> > > > -- vdddo-supply: Chip digital IO regulator.
> > > > -- vdda-supply: Chip analog regulator.
> > > > -- vddd-supply: Chip digital core regulator.
> > > > -
> > > > -The device node must contain one 'port' child node for its digital output
> > > > -video port, in accordance with the video interface bindings defined in
> > > > -Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/video-interfaces.txt.
> > > > -
> > > > -Example:
> > > > -
> > > > - &i2c1 {
> > > > - ...
> > > > -
> > > > - ov5645: ov5645@3c {
> > > > - compatible = "ovti,ov5645";
> > > > - reg = <0x3c>;
> > > > -
> > > > - enable-gpios = <&gpio1 6 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> > > > - reset-gpios = <&gpio5 20 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> > > > - pinctrl-names = "default";
> > > > - pinctrl-0 = <&camera_rear_default>;
> > > > -
> > > > - clocks = <&clks 200>;
> > > > - clock-names = "xclk";
> > > > - assigned-clocks = <&clks 200>;
> > > > - assigned-clock-rates = <24000000>;
> > > > -
> > > > - vdddo-supply = <&camera_dovdd_1v8>;
> > > > - vdda-supply = <&camera_avdd_2v8>;
> > > > - vddd-supply = <&camera_dvdd_1v2>;
> > > > -
> > > > - port {
> > > > - ov5645_ep: endpoint {
> > > > - clock-lanes = <1>;
> > > > - data-lanes = <0 2>;
> > > > - remote-endpoint = <&csi0_ep>;
> > > > - };
> > > > - };
> > > > - };
> > > > - };
> > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ov5645.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ov5645.yaml
> > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > index 000000000000..4bf58ad210c5
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ov5645.yaml
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,140 @@
> > > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > > > +%YAML 1.2
> > > > +---
> > > > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/media/i2c/ov5645.yaml#
> > > > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > > > +
> > > > +title: Omnivision 1/4-Inch 5Mp CMOS Digital Image Sensor
> > >
> > > s/Mp/MP/ ?
> > >
> > > > +
> > > > +maintainers:
> > > > + - Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
> > > > + - Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
> > > > +
> > > > +description: |-
> > > > + The Omnivision OV5645 is a 1/4-Inch CMOS active pixel digital image sensor with
> > > > + an active array size of 2592H x 1944V. It is programmable through a serial I2C
> > > > + interface.
> > > > +
> > > > +properties:
> > > > + compatible:
> > > > + const: ovti,ov5645
> > > > +
> > > > + reg:
> > > > + description: I2C device address
> > > > + maxItems: 1
> > > > +
> > > > + clocks:
> > > > + maxItems: 1
> > > > +
> > > > + clock-names:
> > > > + items:
> > > > + - const: xclk
> > > > +
> > > > + assigned-clocks:
> > > > + maxItems: 1
> > > > +
> > > > + assigned-clock-rates:
> > > > + items:
> > > > + - description: Must be 24MHz (24000000).
> > >
> > > These two properties shouldn't be part of the bindings, they're generic.
> >
> > The fact that they have 1 entry is part of this binding.
>
> I'm not sure to agree. assigned-clocks and assigned-clock-rates are very
> losely defined, and could be placed (at least in theory) in any node.
> Furthermore, in order to cotnrol the rate of xclk, we may need
> assigned-clocks and assigned-clock-rates entries for parents of the xclk
> clock too. There's really nothing that's specific to this device.
>
> Anway, I think the driver should just set the clock rate, so we can drop
> these two properties and skip arguing over them :-)
Works for me. :)
>
> > > > + enable-gpios:
> > > > + description: |-
> > > > + Chip enable GPIO. Polarity is GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH. This corresponds
> > > > + to the hardware pin PWDNB which is physically active low.
> > >
> > > Specifying that the polarity is GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH is confusing in my
> > > opinion. If there's an inverter on the board, you'll need
> > > GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW. We could possibly drop the sentence, as all GPIOs in DT
> > > are supposed to be active high, but the fact that the GPIO name
> > > corresponds to the opposite of the pin probably has to be documented. I
> > > have no better wording to propose now I'm afraid, but it needs to be
> > > addressed. Maybe Rob or Maxime could help.
> >
> > All GPIOs in DT are active high? What?
>
> Re-reading my comment, I've expressed myself very badly here. The point
> is that the GPIO "object" (enable-gpios), conceptually, hides the
> polarity. What's exposed to the OS is something that can be asserted or
> deasserted to have an effect indicated by the GPIO name. The polarity
> then describes what electrical level of the physical GPIO pin
> corresponds to that action. In this case, asserting the GPIO performs
> the "enable" action. As this is connected to the PWDNB pin, we have to
> specify a polarity (active high) that is inverted compared to the PWDNB
> pin polarity (active low). This should be captured in the bindings, but
> syaing that "the polarity is GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH" is wrong. The polarity
> depends on how the signal is routed on the board. I'm not sure how to
> express all these neatly in the bindings. We may not want to address it
> as part of the conversion to YAML, but I think template sentences for
> GPIO descriptions would be useful as guidelines for binding authors.
Yeah, this has come up a couple of times. I think it's important to
state what the polarity of the signal on the device is, but it is
confusing when there's an inverter in the middle.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists