lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 24 Mar 2020 22:13:03 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc:     Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        andreyknvl@...gle.com, aryabinin@...tuozzo.com
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 20 (objtool warnings)

On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 10:53:05AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >> kernel/kcov.o: warning: objtool: __sanitizer_cov_trace_pc()+0x89: call to __ubsan_handle_load_invalid_value() with UACCESS enabled
> >>
> 
> config-r1510 is attached.
> and kcov.o is attached.

I'm thinking this is because of commit:

  0d6958a70483 kcov: collect coverage from interrupts

Which has:

@@ -1230,6 +1230,9 @@ struct task_struct {

+       bool                            kcov_softirq;

@@ -145,9 +157,10 @@ static notrace bool check_kcov_mode(enum kcov_mode needed_mode, struct task_stru

+       if (!in_task() && !(in_serving_softirq() && t->kcov_softirq))

And this __ubsan_handle_load_invalid_value() is verifying a bool is 0,1.

Another reason to hate on _Bool I suppose...

Let me see what to do about that... :/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ