[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALMp9eQ-rzdZHdM0DFzVyaynEhf0+e9rYGqi57fhN54VTFcNnA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 17:12:04 -0700
From: Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>,
Junaid Shahid <junaids@...gle.com>,
Liran Alon <liran.alon@...cle.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
John Haxby <john.haxby@...cle.com>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/37] KVM: nVMX: Invalidate all EPTP contexts when
emulating INVEPT for L1
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 4:51 PM Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On 23/03/20 17:44, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > So I think
> >
> > Fixes: 14c07ad89f4d ("x86/kvm/mmu: introduce guest_mmu")
> >
> > would be appropriate?
> >
>
> Yes.
I think it was actually commit efebf0aaec3d ("KVM: nVMX: Do not flush
TLB on L1<->L2 transitions if L1 uses VPID and EPT").
Powered by blists - more mailing lists