[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200324234947.GA3373941@rani.riverdale.lan>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 19:49:48 -0400
From: Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Lendacky <Thomas.Lendacky@....com>,
Mauro Rossi <issor.oruam@...il.com>,
Michael Matz <matz@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/changes: Raise minimum supported binutils
version to 2.23
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 03:14:38PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 2:42 PM Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu> wrote:
> >
> > This is just a documentation patch right?
>
> That patch, yes.
>
> However, there's a second patch that knows that if we have binutils >=
> 2.22, then we don't need to check for AVX2 or ADX support, because we
> know it's there.
>
> Linus
Ok. But if you're otherwise ok taking those AVX2/ADX patches for 5.7, as
noted in my other email [1], the x86 build has been broken with
binutils <= 2.22 since v5.3.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200324220147.GA3253486@rani.riverdale.lan/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists