| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAFVqi1Sqnn6L9xLQ0=BZp6D=aYz74tRMP0WYEXXVsz2cYXaoHA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 17:53:59 -0600
From: Kelsey <skunberg.kelsey@...il.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
Ruslan Bilovol <ruslan.bilovol@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
Bodong Wang <bodong@...lanox.com>,
Don Dutile <ddutile@...hat.com>, rbilovol@...co.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] PCI: sysfs: Define device attributes with DEVICE_ATTR*
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 12:24 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 12:10:33AM -0600, Kelsey wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 5:20 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 12:51:47PM +0200, Ruslan Bilovol wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 7:01 PM Kelsey Skunberg
> > > > <skunberg.kelsey@...il.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Defining device attributes should be done through the helper
> > > > > DEVICE_ATTR_RO(), DEVICE_ATTR_WO(), or similar. Change all instances using
> > > > > __ATTR* to now use its equivalent DEVICE_ATTR*.
> > > > >
> > > > > Example of old:
> > > > >
> > > > > static struct device_attribute dev_name_##_attr=__ATTR_RO(_name);
> > > > >
> > > > > Example of new:
> > > > >
> > > > > static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(_name);
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Kelsey Skunberg <skunberg.kelsey@...il.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> > > > > 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c b/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
> > > > > index 965c72104150..8af7944fdccb 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
> > > > > @@ -464,9 +464,7 @@ static ssize_t dev_rescan_store(struct device *dev,
> > > > > }
> > > > > return count;
> > > > > }
> > > > > -static struct device_attribute dev_rescan_attr = __ATTR(rescan,
> > > > > - (S_IWUSR|S_IWGRP),
> > > > > - NULL, dev_rescan_store);
> > > > > +static DEVICE_ATTR(rescan, (S_IWUSR | S_IWGRP), NULL, dev_rescan_store);
> > > > >
> > > > > static ssize_t remove_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> > > > > const char *buf, size_t count)
> > > > > @@ -480,9 +478,8 @@ static ssize_t remove_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> > > > > pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device_locked(to_pci_dev(dev));
> > > > > return count;
> > > > > }
> > > > > -static struct device_attribute dev_remove_attr = __ATTR_IGNORE_LOCKDEP(remove,
> > > > > - (S_IWUSR|S_IWGRP),
> > > > > - NULL, remove_store);
> > > > > +static DEVICE_ATTR_IGNORE_LOCKDEP(remove, (S_IWUSR | S_IWGRP), NULL,
> > > > > + remove_store);
> > > > >
> > > > > static ssize_t dev_bus_rescan_store(struct device *dev,
> > > > > struct device_attribute *attr,
> > > > > @@ -504,7 +501,7 @@ static ssize_t dev_bus_rescan_store(struct device *dev,
> > > > > }
> > > > > return count;
> > > > > }
> > > > > -static DEVICE_ATTR(rescan, (S_IWUSR|S_IWGRP), NULL, dev_bus_rescan_store);
> > > > > +static DEVICE_ATTR(bus_rescan, (S_IWUSR | S_IWGRP), NULL, dev_bus_rescan_store);
> > > >
> > > > This patch renamed 'rescan' to 'bus_rescan' and broke my userspace application.
> > > > There is also mismatch now between real functionality and documentation
> > > > Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-pci which still contains old "rescan"
> > > > descriptions.
> > > >
> > > > Another patch from this patch series also renamed 'rescan' to 'dev_rescan'
> > > >
> > > > Here is a comparison between two stable kernels (with and without this
> > > > patch series):
> > > >
> > > > v5.4
> > > > # find /sys -name '*rescan'
> > > > /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:01.2/dev_rescan
> > > > /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:01.0/dev_rescan
> > > > /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:04.0/dev_rescan
> > > > /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.0/dev_rescan
> > > > /sys/devices/pci0000:00/pci_bus/0000:00/bus_rescan
> > > > /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:01.3/dev_rescan
> > > > /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:03.0/dev_rescan
> > > > /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:01.1/dev_rescan
> > > > /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:02.0/dev_rescan
> > > > /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:05.0/dev_rescan
> > > > /sys/bus/pci/rescan
> > > >
> > > > v4.19
> > > > # find /sys -name '*rescan'
> > > > /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:01.2/rescan
> > > > /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:01.0/rescan
> > > > /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:04.0/rescan
> > > > /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.0/rescan
> > > > /sys/devices/pci0000:00/pci_bus/0000:00/rescan
> > > > /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:01.3/rescan
> > > > /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:03.0/rescan
> > > > /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:01.1/rescan
> > > > /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:02.0/rescan
> > > > /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:05.0/rescan
> > > > /sys/bus/pci/rescan
> > > >
> > > > Do we maintain this kind of API as non-changeable?
> > >
> > > Yeah, that's a bug and should be fixed, sorry for missing that on
> > > review.
> > >
> > > Kelsey, can you fix this up?
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > >
> > > greg k-h
> >
> > I'd be happy to help get this fixed up.
> >
> > Would it be proper to go back to using DEVICE_ATTR() for 'bus_rescan'
> > and 'dev_rescan' in order to change their names back to 'rescan'?
>
> Yes.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Ack. Sent a patch out. Will stay posted in case any updates need to be made.
commit 4cb9e42d3226 ("PCI: sysfs: Change bus_rescan and dev_rescan to rescan")
Thanks!
- Kelsey
Powered by blists - more mailing lists