linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fix __percpu annotation in asm-generic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 24 Mar 2020 07:44:52 +0100
From:   Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@...il.com>
To:     "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
Cc:     Christopher Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
        Dennis Zhou <dennis@...nel.org>,
        Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix __percpu annotation in asm-generic

On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 10:13:47PM -0600, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 01:00:37AM +0100, Luc Van Oostenryck wrote:
> > Note: it would be much much nicer to do all these type generic
> >       macros with '__auto_type' (only supported in GCC 4.9 IIUC
> >       and supported in sparse but it shouldn't be very hard to do)..
> 
> I'm curious to know if you know why we're not using __auto_type. Because
> we're stuck on gcc 4.6, or is there a more subtle reason?

I suppose. I don't remember having ever seen a discussion on the
subject (other than a simple remark like "it would be simpler
with __auto_type").

Mainline Sparse doesn't support it but I've a pending series for it
that seems to work well. 

-- Luc