[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <10b5c2da-38cf-c6ba-bdf5-1064f433c3d6@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 17:23:32 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Jason A . Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 9/9] x86: replace arch macros from compiler with
CONFIG_X86_{32,64}
On 2020-03-23 17:13, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> If the intention is to check i386/x86_64 excluding UML,
> checking CONFIG_X86_{32,64} is simpler.
>
> The reason for checking __i386__ / __x86_64__ was perhaps because
> lib/raid6/algos.c is built not only for the kernel but also for
> testing the library code from userspace.
>
> However, lib/raid6/test/Makefile passes -DCONFIG_X86_{32,64} for
> this case. So, I do not see a reason to not use CONFIG option here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin (Intel) <hpa@...or.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists