[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <158504139794.28353.15121164288284124653.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 09:16:37 -0000
From: "tip-bot2 for Paul E. McKenney" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
x86 <x86@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [tip: core/rcu] srcu: Hold srcu_struct ->lock when updating ->srcu_gp_seq
The following commit has been merged into the core/rcu branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 710426068dc60f2d2e139478d6185710802cdc0a
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/710426068dc60f2d2e139478d6185710802cdc0a
Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
AuthorDate: Fri, 03 Jan 2020 11:42:05 -08:00
Committer: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
CommitterDate: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 16:01:11 -08:00
srcu: Hold srcu_struct ->lock when updating ->srcu_gp_seq
A read of the srcu_struct structure's ->srcu_gp_seq field should not
need READ_ONCE() when that structure's ->lock is held. Except that this
lock is not always held when updating this field. This commit therefore
acquires the lock around updates and removes a now-unneeded READ_ONCE().
This data race was reported by KCSAN.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
[ paulmck: Switch from READ_ONCE() to lock per Peter Zilstra question. ]
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
---
kernel/rcu/srcutree.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
index 119a373..c19c1df 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
@@ -450,7 +450,7 @@ static void srcu_gp_start(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
spin_unlock_rcu_node(sdp); /* Interrupts remain disabled. */
smp_mb(); /* Order prior store to ->srcu_gp_seq_needed vs. GP start. */
rcu_seq_start(&ssp->srcu_gp_seq);
- state = rcu_seq_state(READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_gp_seq));
+ state = rcu_seq_state(ssp->srcu_gp_seq);
WARN_ON_ONCE(state != SRCU_STATE_SCAN1);
}
@@ -1130,7 +1130,9 @@ static void srcu_advance_state(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
return; /* readers present, retry later. */
}
srcu_flip(ssp);
+ spin_lock_irq_rcu_node(ssp);
rcu_seq_set_state(&ssp->srcu_gp_seq, SRCU_STATE_SCAN2);
+ spin_unlock_irq_rcu_node(ssp);
}
if (rcu_seq_state(READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_gp_seq)) == SRCU_STATE_SCAN2) {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists