[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87369yf5jh.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 10:47:30 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
"Joel Fernandes \(Google\)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
"Steven Rostedt \(VMware\)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch V3 04/23] kprobes: Prevent probes in .noinstr.text section
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org> writes:
> On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 17:03:24 +0100
> Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>> > @@ -2212,6 +2212,10 @@ static int __init populate_kprobe_blacklist(unsigned long *start,
>> > ret = kprobe_add_area_blacklist((unsigned long)__kprobes_text_start,
>> > (unsigned long)__kprobes_text_end);
>> >
>> > + /* Symbols in noinstr section are blacklisted */
>> > + ret = kprobe_add_area_blacklist((unsigned long)__noinstr_text_start,
>> > + (unsigned long)__noinstr_text_end);
>> > +
>> > return ret ? : arch_populate_kprobe_blacklist();
>> > }
>>
>> So that extra function is not required when adding that, right?
>
> That's right :)
>
>>
>> >> +/* Functions in .noinstr.text must not be probed */
>> >> +static bool within_noinstr_text(unsigned long addr)
>> >> +{
>> >> + /* FIXME: Handle module .noinstr.text */
>
> And this reminds me that the module .kprobes.text is not handled yet :(.
Correct. Any idea how to do that with a simple oneliner like the above?
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists