linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 10/15] iommu/arm-smmu: Use accessor functions for iommu private data

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200324100819.GA4038@8bytes.org>
Date:   Tue, 24 Mar 2020 11:08:19 +0100
From:   Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To:     Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc:     "iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "guohanjun@...wei.com" <guohanjun@...wei.com>,
        Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@....com>,
        Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/15] iommu/arm-smmu: Use accessor functions for
 iommu private data

Hey Robin,

On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 04:02:33PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
> Yikes, this ends up pretty ugly, and I'd prefer not have this much
> complexity hidden in macros that were intended just to be convenient
> shorthand. Would you mind pulling in the patch below as a precursor?

Sure thing, but your mail-client seemed to have fiddled with the patch
so that is is unusable to me. I tried to fix it up, but it still doesn't
apply. Can you please re-send it to me either via git-send-email or just
as a mime-attachement?

> Other than that, the rest of the series looks OK at a glance. We should also
> move fwspec->ops to dev_iommu, as those are "IOMMU API" data rather than
> "firmware" data, but let's consider that separately as this series is
> already long enough.

Yes, moving ops out of fwspec is next on the list, and moving the
iommu_group pointer into dev_iommu.

Regards,

	Joerg