linux-kernel - Re: [5.6.0-rc7] Kernel crash while running ndctl tests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200324101401.GA9942@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>
Date:   Tue, 24 Mar 2020 18:14:01 +0800
From:   Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
To:     "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Sachin Sant <sachinp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org
Subject: Re: [5.6.0-rc7] Kernel crash while running ndctl tests

On 03/24/20 at 03:06pm, Sachin Sant wrote:
> 
> 
> > On 24-Mar-2020, at 2:45 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
> > 
> > Sachin Sant <sachinp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> > 
> >> While running ndctl[1] tests against 5.6.0-rc7 following crash is encountered.
> >> 
> >> Bisect leads me to  commit d41e2f3bd546 
> >> mm/hotplug: fix hot remove failure in SPARSEMEM|!VMEMMAP case
> >> 
> >> Reverting this commit helps and the tests complete without any crash.
> > 
> > 
> > Can you try this change?
> > 
> > diff --git a/mm/sparse.c b/mm/sparse.c
> > index aadb7298dcef..3012d1f3771a 100644
> > --- a/mm/sparse.c
> > +++ b/mm/sparse.c
> > @@ -781,6 +781,8 @@ static void section_deactivate(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
> > 			ms->usage = NULL;
> > 		}
> > 		memmap = sparse_decode_mem_map(ms->section_mem_map, section_nr);
> > +		/* Mark the section invalid */
> > +		ms->section_mem_map &= ~SECTION_HAS_MEM_MAP;
> > 	}
> > 
> > 	if (section_is_early && memmap)
> > 
> 
> This patch works for me. The test ran successfully without any crash/failure.

Hi Aneesh,

Could you make a formal patch to post, since Sachin has tested and
confirmed it works?

> 
> Thanks
> -Sachin
> 
> > a pfn_valid check involves pnf_section_valid() check if section is
> > having MEM_MAP. In this case we did end up  setting the ms->uage = NULL.
> > So when we do that tupdate the section to not have MEM_MAP.
> > 
> > -aneesh
>