linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] dt-bindings: thermal: Add yaml bindings for thermal zones

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 24 Mar 2020 16:03:00 +0530
From:   Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
        Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] dt-bindings: thermal: Add yaml bindings for
 thermal zones

On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 2:46 AM Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 2:46 PM Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Rob,
> >
> > Thanks for the review.
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 8:19 PM Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 06:26:43PM +0530, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> > > > As part of moving the thermal bindings to YAML, split it up into 3
> > > > bindings: thermal sensors, cooling devices and thermal zones.
> > > >
> > > > The thermal-zone binding is a software abstraction to capture the
> > > > properties of each zone - how often they should be checked, the
> > > > temperature thresholds (trips) at which mitigation actions need to be
> > > > taken and the level of mitigation needed at those thresholds.
>

[...]

>
> > > > +            /* ... */
> > > > +
> > > > +            gpu-thermal-top {
> > >
> > > This one is not going to match (which should cause an error).
> >
> > Good catch. Unfortunately, this isn't getting caught. Nor is the
> > 12-char limitation before -thermal in the thermal zone name. I can't
> > figure out why.
>
> That's because this schema has to be included by another schema which
> matches on a parent node containing 'thermal-zones'. If
> 'thermal-zones' can be at the root node, then you should rework this
> such that you have $nodename: {const: thermal-zones} as a top-level
> property.

I've done all the change requested in the review(see attached patch),
including moving to

properties:
   $nodename:
       const: thermal-zones

but that generates a bunch of errors similar to:

/home/amit/work/builds/build-aarch64/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/zte.example.dt.yaml:
/: $nodename:0: 'thermal-zones' was expected
/home/amit/work/builds/build-aarch64/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/psci.example.dt.yaml:
/: $nodename:0: 'thermal-zones' was expected
/home/amit/work/builds/build-aarch64/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.example.dt.yaml:
/: $nodename:0: 'thermal-zones' was expected
/home/amit/work/builds/build-aarch64/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sprd/sprd.example.dt.yaml:
/: $nodename:0: 'thermal-zones' was expected
/home/amit/work/builds/build-aarch64/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/calxeda.example.dt.yaml:
/: $nodename:0: 'thermal-zones' was expected
/home/amit/work/builds/build-aarch64/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/ti,davinci.example.dt.yaml:
/: $nodename:0: 'thermal-zones' was expected
/home/amit/work/builds/build-aarch64/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/spear.example.dt.yaml:
/: $nodename:0: 'thermal-zones' was expected
/home/amit/work/builds/build-aarch64/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/nspire.example.dt.yaml:
/: $nodename:0: 'thermal-zones' was expected

It seems like dtc is expecting every node to have a thermal-zones node?

Looking at other root nodes such as cpus.yaml, the main difference I
noticed was the absence of the "select: true" property. However, if I
remove that, we go back to the schema not being applied.

You mentioned that the thermal-zones schema needs to included by
another schema. What did you mean by that?

Regards,
Amit

View attachment "0001-dt-bindings-thermal-Add-yaml-bindings-for-thermal-zo.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (14507 bytes)