lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200323180836.2d824f5d45f2f5dce729d5b2@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 23 Mar 2020 18:08:36 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        <kernel-team@...com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Bharata B Rao <bharata@...ux.ibm.com>,
        <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: fork: fix kernel_stack memcg stats for various
 stack implementations

On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 18:06:33 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:

> And here's the altered "mm: memcg/slab: introduce
> mem_cgroup_from_obj()", which I have renamed to "mm: memcg/slab: use
> mem_cgroup_from_obj()":
> 
> The end result is slightly different - mem_cgroup_from_obj() will now
> end up inside #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM.  Should I undo that?

err, no, we've just fed forward the build fixes in
mm-memcg-slab-introduce-mem_cgroup_from_obj-v2.patch so I think we're
all good.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ