[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKwvOdnp8qU46SH0yJDrRZBXr+KyH_M8LvsaOatuVP=h9qc1Lw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 18:26:34 -0700
From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To: Clement Courbet <courbet@...gle.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Alias memset to __builtin_memset.
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 6:22 PM Nick Desaulniers
<ndesaulniers@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 4:43 AM 'Clement Courbet' via Clang Built
> Linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com> wrote:
> >
> > Recent compilers know the meaning of builtins (`memset`,
> > `memcpy`, ...) and can replace calls by inline code when
> > deemed better. For example, `memset(p, 0, 4)` will be lowered
> > to a four-byte zero store.
> >
> > When using -ffreestanding (this is the case e.g. building on
> > clang), these optimizations are disabled. This means that **all**
> > memsets, including those with small, constant sizes, will result
> > in an actual call to memset.
>
> Isn't this only added for 32b x86 (if I'm reading arch/x86/Makefile
> right)? Who's adding it for 64b?
>
> arch/x86/Makefile has a comment:
> 88 # temporary until string.h is fixed
> 89 KBUILD_CFLAGS += -ffreestanding
> Did you look into fixing that?
>
> >
> > We have identified several spots where we have high CPU usage
> > because of this. For example, a single one of these memsets is
> > responsible for about 0.3% of our total CPU usage in the kernel.
> >
> > Aliasing `memset` to `__builtin_memset` allows the compiler to
> > perform this optimization even when -ffreestanding is used.
> > There is no change when -ffreestanding is not used.
> >
> > Below is a diff (clang) for `update_sg_lb_stats()`, which
> > includes the aforementionned hot memset:
> > memset(sgs, 0, sizeof(*sgs));
Further, `make CC=clang -j71 kernel/sched/fair.o V=1` doesn't show
`-ffreestanding` being used. Any idea where it's coming from in your
build? Maybe a local modification to be removed?
> >
> > Diff:
> > movq %rsi, %rbx ~~~> movq $0x0, 0x40(%r8)
> > movq %rdi, %r15 ~~~> movq $0x0, 0x38(%r8)
> > movl $0x48, %edx ~~~> movq $0x0, 0x30(%r8)
> > movq %r8, %rdi ~~~> movq $0x0, 0x28(%r8)
> > xorl %esi, %esi ~~~> movq $0x0, 0x20(%r8)
> > callq <memset> ~~~> movq $0x0, 0x18(%r8)
> > ~~~> movq $0x0, 0x10(%r8)
> > ~~~> movq $0x0, 0x8(%r8)
> > ~~~> movq $0x0, (%r8)
> >
> > In terms of code size, this grows the clang-built kernel a
> > bit (+0.022%):
> > 440285512 vmlinux.clang.after
> > 440383608 vmlinux.clang.before
>
> The before number looks bigger? Did it shrink in size, or was the
> above mislabeled?
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Clement Courbet <courbet@...gle.com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/include/asm/string_64.h | 10 ++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/string_64.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/string_64.h
> > index 75314c3dbe47..7073c25aa4a3 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/string_64.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/string_64.h
> > @@ -18,6 +18,15 @@ extern void *__memcpy(void *to, const void *from, size_t len);
> > void *memset(void *s, int c, size_t n);
> > void *__memset(void *s, int c, size_t n);
> >
> > +/* Recent compilers can generate much better code for known size and/or
> > + * fill values, and will fallback on `memset` if they fail.
> > + * We alias `memset` to `__builtin_memset` explicitly to inform the compiler to
> > + * perform this optimization even when -ffreestanding is used.
> > + */
> > +#if (__GNUC__ >= 4)
> > +#define memset(s, c, count) __builtin_memset(s, c, count)
> > +#endif
> > +
> > #define __HAVE_ARCH_MEMSET16
> > static inline void *memset16(uint16_t *s, uint16_t v, size_t n)
> > {
> > @@ -74,6 +83,7 @@ int strcmp(const char *cs, const char *ct);
> > #undef memcpy
> > #define memcpy(dst, src, len) __memcpy(dst, src, len)
> > #define memmove(dst, src, len) __memmove(dst, src, len)
> > +#undef memset
> > #define memset(s, c, n) __memset(s, c, n)
> >
> > #ifndef __NO_FORTIFY
> > --
>
> --
> Thanks,
> ~Nick Desaulniers
--
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists