[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0ac3af1c-5160-a528-f2b4-aac4833ce32c@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 10:27:18 +0800
From: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@...il.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 08/23] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Plumb skeletal VSGI irqchip
On 2020/3/21 2:23, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> +static int its_sgi_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d,
> + const struct cpumask *mask_val,
> + bool force)
> +{
> + /*
> + * There is no notion of affinity for virtual SGIs, at least
> + * not on the host (since they can only be targetting a vPE).
> + * Tell the kernel we've done whetever it asked for.
new typo?
s/whetever/whatever/
> + */
> + return IRQ_SET_MASK_OK;
> +}
Thanks,
Zenghui
Powered by blists - more mailing lists