| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20200324130818.009519559@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 14:11:24 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Sachin Sant <sachinp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
PUVICHAKRAVARTHY RAMACHANDRAN <puvichakravarthy@...ibm.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Bharata B Rao <bharata@...ux.ibm.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Christopher Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>,
Nathan Lynch <nathanl@...ux.ibm.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.5 099/119] mm, slub: prevent kmalloc_node crashes and memory leaks
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
commit 0715e6c516f106ed553828a671d30ad9a3431536 upstream.
Sachin reports [1] a crash in SLUB __slab_alloc():
BUG: Kernel NULL pointer dereference on read at 0x000073b0
Faulting instruction address: 0xc0000000003d55f4
Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1]
LE PAGE_SIZE=64K MMU=Hash SMP NR_CPUS=2048 NUMA pSeries
Modules linked in:
CPU: 19 PID: 1 Comm: systemd Not tainted 5.6.0-rc2-next-20200218-autotest #1
NIP: c0000000003d55f4 LR: c0000000003d5b94 CTR: 0000000000000000
REGS: c0000008b37836d0 TRAP: 0300 Not tainted (5.6.0-rc2-next-20200218-autotest)
MSR: 8000000000009033 <SF,EE,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE> CR: 24004844 XER: 00000000
CFAR: c00000000000dec4 DAR: 00000000000073b0 DSISR: 40000000 IRQMASK: 1
GPR00: c0000000003d5b94 c0000008b3783960 c00000000155d400 c0000008b301f500
GPR04: 0000000000000dc0 0000000000000002 c0000000003443d8 c0000008bb398620
GPR08: 00000008ba2f0000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
GPR12: 0000000024004844 c00000001ec52a00 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
GPR16: c0000008a1b20048 c000000001595898 c000000001750c18 0000000000000002
GPR20: c000000001750c28 c000000001624470 0000000fffffffe0 5deadbeef0000122
GPR24: 0000000000000001 0000000000000dc0 0000000000000002 c0000000003443d8
GPR28: c0000008b301f500 c0000008bb398620 0000000000000000 c00c000002287180
NIP ___slab_alloc+0x1f4/0x760
LR __slab_alloc+0x34/0x60
Call Trace:
___slab_alloc+0x334/0x760 (unreliable)
__slab_alloc+0x34/0x60
__kmalloc_node+0x110/0x490
kvmalloc_node+0x58/0x110
mem_cgroup_css_online+0x108/0x270
online_css+0x48/0xd0
cgroup_apply_control_enable+0x2ec/0x4d0
cgroup_mkdir+0x228/0x5f0
kernfs_iop_mkdir+0x90/0xf0
vfs_mkdir+0x110/0x230
do_mkdirat+0xb0/0x1a0
system_call+0x5c/0x68
This is a PowerPC platform with following NUMA topology:
available: 2 nodes (0-1)
node 0 cpus:
node 0 size: 0 MB
node 0 free: 0 MB
node 1 cpus: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
node 1 size: 35247 MB
node 1 free: 30907 MB
node distances:
node 0 1
0: 10 40
1: 40 10
possible numa nodes: 0-31
This only happens with a mmotm patch "mm/memcontrol.c: allocate
shrinker_map on appropriate NUMA node" [2] which effectively calls
kmalloc_node for each possible node. SLUB however only allocates
kmem_cache_node on online N_NORMAL_MEMORY nodes, and relies on
node_to_mem_node to return such valid node for other nodes since commit
a561ce00b09e ("slub: fall back to node_to_mem_node() node if allocating
on memoryless node"). This is however not true in this configuration
where the _node_numa_mem_ array is not initialized for nodes 0 and 2-31,
thus it contains zeroes and get_partial() ends up accessing
non-allocated kmem_cache_node.
A related issue was reported by Bharata (originally by Ramachandran) [3]
where a similar PowerPC configuration, but with mainline kernel without
patch [2] ends up allocating large amounts of pages by kmalloc-1k
kmalloc-512. This seems to have the same underlying issue with
node_to_mem_node() not behaving as expected, and might probably also
lead to an infinite loop with CONFIG_SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL [4].
This patch should fix both issues by not relying on node_to_mem_node()
anymore and instead simply falling back to NUMA_NO_NODE, when
kmalloc_node(node) is attempted for a node that's not online, or has no
usable memory. The "usable memory" condition is also changed from
node_present_pages() to N_NORMAL_MEMORY node state, as that is exactly
the condition that SLUB uses to allocate kmem_cache_node structures.
The check in get_partial() is removed completely, as the checks in
___slab_alloc() are now sufficient to prevent get_partial() being
reached with an invalid node.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/3381CD91-AB3D-4773-BA04-E7A072A63968@linux.vnet.ibm.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/fff0e636-4c36-ed10-281c-8cdb0687c839@virtuozzo.com/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20200317092624.GB22538@in.ibm.com/
[4] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/088b5996-faae-8a56-ef9c-5b567125ae54@suse.cz/
Fixes: a561ce00b09e ("slub: fall back to node_to_mem_node() node if allocating on memoryless node")
Reported-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reported-by: PUVICHAKRAVARTHY RAMACHANDRAN <puvichakravarthy@...ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Bharata B Rao <bharata@...ux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc: Christopher Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200320115533.9604-1-vbabka@suse.cz
Debugged-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
mm/slub.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -1954,8 +1954,6 @@ static void *get_partial(struct kmem_cac
if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE)
searchnode = numa_mem_id();
- else if (!node_present_pages(node))
- searchnode = node_to_mem_node(node);
object = get_partial_node(s, get_node(s, searchnode), c, flags);
if (object || node != NUMA_NO_NODE)
@@ -2544,17 +2542,27 @@ static void *___slab_alloc(struct kmem_c
struct page *page;
page = c->page;
- if (!page)
+ if (!page) {
+ /*
+ * if the node is not online or has no normal memory, just
+ * ignore the node constraint
+ */
+ if (unlikely(node != NUMA_NO_NODE &&
+ !node_state(node, N_NORMAL_MEMORY)))
+ node = NUMA_NO_NODE;
goto new_slab;
+ }
redo:
if (unlikely(!node_match(page, node))) {
- int searchnode = node;
-
- if (node != NUMA_NO_NODE && !node_present_pages(node))
- searchnode = node_to_mem_node(node);
-
- if (unlikely(!node_match(page, searchnode))) {
+ /*
+ * same as above but node_match() being false already
+ * implies node != NUMA_NO_NODE
+ */
+ if (!node_state(node, N_NORMAL_MEMORY)) {
+ node = NUMA_NO_NODE;
+ goto redo;
+ } else {
stat(s, ALLOC_NODE_MISMATCH);
deactivate_slab(s, page, c->freelist, c);
goto new_slab;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists