[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <d0c6c22455811e9f0eda01f9bc70d1398b51b2bd.1585160616.git.asutoshd@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 11:29:00 -0700
From: Asutosh Das <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>
To: Avri.Altman@....com, cang@...eaurora.org,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Asutosh Das <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
Venkat Gopalakrishnan <venkatg@...eaurora.org>,
Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] scsi: ufshcd: Update the set frequency to devfreq
Currently, the frequency that devfreq provides the
driver to set always leads the clocks to be scaled up.
Hence, round the clock-rate to the nearest frequency
before deciding to scale.
Also update the devfreq statistics of current frequency.
Signed-off-by: Asutosh Das <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>
---
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
index 2a2a63b..7916c8b 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
@@ -1187,6 +1187,9 @@ static int ufshcd_devfreq_target(struct device *dev,
if (!ufshcd_is_clkscaling_supported(hba))
return -EINVAL;
+ clki = list_first_entry(&hba->clk_list_head, struct ufs_clk_info, list);
+ /* Override with the closest supported frequency */
+ *freq = (unsigned long) clk_round_rate(clki->clk, *freq);
spin_lock_irqsave(hba->host->host_lock, irq_flags);
if (ufshcd_eh_in_progress(hba)) {
spin_unlock_irqrestore(hba->host->host_lock, irq_flags);
@@ -1201,8 +1204,11 @@ static int ufshcd_devfreq_target(struct device *dev,
goto out;
}
- clki = list_first_entry(&hba->clk_list_head, struct ufs_clk_info, list);
+ /* Decide based on the rounded-off frequency and update */
scale_up = (*freq == clki->max_freq) ? true : false;
+ if (!scale_up)
+ *freq = clki->min_freq;
+ /* Update the frequency */
if (!ufshcd_is_devfreq_scaling_required(hba, scale_up)) {
spin_unlock_irqrestore(hba->host->host_lock, irq_flags);
ret = 0;
@@ -1250,6 +1256,8 @@ static int ufshcd_devfreq_get_dev_status(struct device *dev,
struct ufs_hba *hba = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
struct ufs_clk_scaling *scaling = &hba->clk_scaling;
unsigned long flags;
+ struct list_head *clk_list = &hba->clk_list_head;
+ struct ufs_clk_info *clki;
if (!ufshcd_is_clkscaling_supported(hba))
return -EINVAL;
@@ -1260,6 +1268,13 @@ static int ufshcd_devfreq_get_dev_status(struct device *dev,
if (!scaling->window_start_t)
goto start_window;
+ clki = list_first_entry(clk_list, struct ufs_clk_info, list);
+ /*
+ * If current frequency is 0, then the ondemand governor considers
+ * there's no initial frequency set. And it always requests to set
+ * to max. frequency.
+ */
+ stat->current_frequency = clki->curr_freq;
if (scaling->is_busy_started)
scaling->tot_busy_t += ktime_to_us(ktime_sub(ktime_get(),
scaling->busy_start_t));
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists