[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200325191103.GA6495@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 12:11:03 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Nick Bowler <nbowler@...conx.ca>
Cc: linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme: Fix NVME_IOCTL_ADMIN_CMD compat address handling.
A couple of comments:
No need for the "." the end of the subject line.
I also think you should just talk of the nvme_user_cmd function,
as that also is used for the NVME_IOCTL_IO_CMD ioctl. Also there now
is a nvme_user_cmd64 variant that needs the same fix, can you also
include that?
> + if (in_compat_syscall()) {
> + /*
> + * On real 32-bit kernels this implementation ignores the
> + * upper bits of address fields so we must replicate that
> + * behaviour in the compat case.
s/real //g please, there are no fake 32-vit kernels :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists