lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dd82e9cb-6c88-58cf-933e-f2a644e09b15@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 25 Mar 2020 14:05:32 -0600
From:   shuah <shuah@...nel.org>
To:     Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>, brendanhiggins@...gle.com,
        frowand.list@...il.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc:     corbet@....net, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, shuah <shuah@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 kunit-next 3/4] kunit: subtests should be indented 4
 spaces according to TAP

On 3/13/20 8:44 AM, Alan Maguire wrote:
> Introduce KUNIT_INDENT macro which corresponds to 4-space indentation,
> and use it to modify indentation from tab to 4 spaces.
> 
> Suggested-by: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...y.com>
> ---
>   include/kunit/test.h                |  7 +++-
>   lib/kunit/assert.c                  | 79 +++++++++++++++++++------------------
>   lib/kunit/test.c                    |  6 +--
>   tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py | 10 ++---
>   4 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h
> index f7b2ed4c..d49cdb4 100644
> --- a/include/kunit/test.h
> +++ b/include/kunit/test.h
> @@ -84,6 +84,10 @@ struct kunit_resource {
>   /* Size of log associated with test. */
>   #define KUNIT_LOG_SIZE	512
>   
> +/* TAP specifies subtest indentation of 4 spaces. */
> +#define KUNIT_INDENT	"    "
> +#define KUNIT_INDENT2	KUNIT_INDENT KUNIT_INDENT

Sorry for a late comment on this.

What's the reason to do it this way? Why wouldn't you define
it as 8 spaces long string?

Also can you please make sure to run checkpatch --strict on the
patches you send?

thanks,
-- Shuah

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ