linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] nvme: Fix NVME_IOCTL_ADMIN

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CADyTPEyKyEc1fx6wRGJAT_QctgMcrB1SWP_9-QdewXU3xYGumw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 25 Mar 2020 16:47:32 -0400
From:   Nick Bowler <nbowler@...conx.ca>
To:     Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme: Fix NVME_IOCTL_ADMIN_CMD compat address handling.

On 2020-03-25, Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 12:11:03PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> A couple of comments:
>>
>> No need for the "." the end of the subject line.
>>
>> I also think you should just talk of the nvme_user_cmd function,
>> as that also is used for the NVME_IOCTL_IO_CMD ioctl.  Also there now
>> is a nvme_user_cmd64 variant that needs the same fix, can you also
>> include that?
>
> Yes, this patch should get those cases too.
>
> I unstaged this patch for now, could you send a v2 with the suggestions?

Will do.

Cheers,
  Nick