[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200325083012.GA21605@lst.de>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 09:30:12 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Fredrik Noring <noring@...rew.org>, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] MIPS: remove cpu_has_64bit_gp_regs and
cpu_has_64bit_addresses
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 02:36:57AM +0000, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Mar 2020, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> > Both macros are always identical to CONFIG_64BIT.
>
> I think this abstraction makes sense, especially if we want to support
> 64-bit CPUs that only support 32-bit segments, i.e. MIPS architecture
> processors whose CP0.Config.AT=1, or legacy MIPS processors that had a
> similar limitation, such as the R5900 currently under review.
The only use of cpu_has_64bit_addresses is the choice of the ioremap
code base. Which ioremap code does the R5900 want to use? If it
doesn't match CONFIG_64BIT having a config option for the ioremap
implementation seems much more sensible, and can be added with the
R5900 patch set (do you have a link to it?).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists