linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] dma-mapping: add a dma_ops

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200325083740.GC21605@lst.de>
Date:   Wed, 25 Mar 2020 09:37:40 +0100
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@...abs.ru>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dma-mapping: add a dma_ops_bypass flag to struct
 device

On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 03:51:36PM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> >> This is for persistent memory which you can DMA to/from but yet it does
> >> not appear in the system as a normal memory and therefore requires
> >> special handling anyway (O_DIRECT or DAX, I do not know the exact
> >> mechanics). All other devices in the system should just run as usual,
> >> i.e. use 1:1 mapping if possible.
> > 
> > On other systems (x86 and arm) pmem as long as it is page backed does
> > not require any special handling.  This must be some weird way powerpc
> > fucked up again, and I suspect you'll have to suffer from it.
> 
> 
> It does not matter if it is backed by pages or not, the problem may also
> appear if we wanted for example p2p PCI via IOMMU (between PHBs) and
> MMIO might be mapped way too high in the system address space and make
> 1:1 impossible.

How can it be mapped too high for a direct mapping with a 64-bit DMA
mask?