[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AM0PR04MB44814A22B7630D736AE2003688CE0@AM0PR04MB4481.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 12:27:07 +0000
From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
To: Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>
CC: "sboyd@...nel.org" <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>,
"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@....com>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@....com>,
"linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jacky Bai <ping.bai@....com>,
"l.stach@...gutronix.de" <l.stach@...gutronix.de>
Subject: RE: [PATCH RESEND v3 1/4] clk: imx: imx8mq: fix a53 cpu clock
> Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v3 1/4] clk: imx: imx8mq: fix a53 cpu clock
>
> On 2020-03-11 3:16 AM, Peng Fan wrote:
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v3 1/4] clk: imx: imx8mq: fix a53 cpu
> >> clock
> >>
> >> On 19.02.2020 12:23, Peng Fan wrote:
> >>> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> >>>
> >>> The A53 CCM clk root only accepts input up to 1GHz, CCM A53 root
> >>> signoff timing is 1Ghz, however the A53 core which sources from CCM
> >>> root could run above 1GHz which violates the CCM.
> >>>
> >>> There is a CORE_SEL slice before A53 core, we need to configure the
> >>> CORE_SEL slice source from ARM PLL, not A53 CCM clk root.
> >>>
> >>> The A53 CCM clk root should only be used when need to change ARM PLL
> >>> frequency.
> >>>
> >>> Add arm_a53_core clk that could source from arm_a53_div and
> >> arm_pll_out.
> >>> Configure a53 ccm root sources from 800MHz sys pll Configure a53
> >>> core sources from arm_pll_out Mark arm_a53_core as critical clock
> >>>
> >>> + clk_hw_set_parent(hws[IMX8MQ_CLK_A53_SRC],
> >> hws[IMX8MQ_SYS1_PLL_800M]);
> >>> + clk_hw_set_parent(hws[IMX8MQ_CLK_A53_CORE],
> >>> +hws[IMX8MQ_ARM_PLL_OUT]);
> >>
> >> This triggers lockdep warnings:
> >>
> >> [ 2.041743] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> >>
> >> [ 2.043531] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 1 at drivers/clk/clk.c:2480
> >> clk_core_set_parent_nolock+0x1d4/0x508
> >> [ 2.052584] Modules linked in:
> >>
> >> [ 2.055642] CPU: 2 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted
> >> 5.6.0-rc4-next-20200306-00027-g6b7e51d87f22 #225
> >> [ 2.064966] Hardware name: NXP i.MX8MQ EVK (DT)
> >>
> >> [ 2.069504] pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO)
> >>
> >> [ 2.074298] pc : clk_core_set_parent_nolock+0x1d4/0x508
> >>
> >> [ 2.079529] lr : clk_core_set_parent_nolock+0x1d0/0x508
> >>
> >>
> >> [ 2.084759] sp : ffff80001003b9b0
> >>
> >>
> >> [ 2.088072] x29: ffff80001003b9b0 x28: ffff8000116e8218
> >>
> >>
> >> [ 2.093392] x27: 0000000000004570 x26: ffff8000128745d0
> >>
> >>
> >> [ 2.098711] x25: ffff0000b8422008 x24: ffff0000b8422008
> >>
> >> [ 2.104030] x23: ffff80001104a518 x22: ffff80001104a508
> >>
> >> [ 2.109349] x21: ffff800012260bf8 x20: ffff0000b84c9600
> >>
> >> [ 2.114668] x19: ffff0000b84cbb00 x18: 0000000000004530
> >>
> >> [ 2.119987] x17: 0000000000004520 x16: 0000000000004510
> >>
> >>
> >> [ 2.125307] x15: 00000000000045d0 x14: 0000000000004500
> >>
> >>
> >> [ 2.130626] x13: 00000000000044f0 x12: 00000000000044e0
> >>
> >> [ 2.135945] x11: ffff8000116e6c68 x10: ffff8000117d7000
> >>
> >>
> >> [ 2.141264] x9 : ffff80001067007c x8 : 0000000000000000
> >>
> >> [ 2.146583] x7 : ffff800010671938 x6 : 0000000000000000
> >>
> >>
> >> [ 2.151903] x5 : ffff800011633000 x4 : 0000000000000000
> >>
> >> [ 2.157222] x3 : ffff80001003b804 x2 : 0000000000000000
> >>
> >>
> >> [ 2.162541] x1 : ffff0000b9da0000 x0 : 0000000000000000
> >>
> >> [ 2.167862] Call trace:
> >>
> >> [ 2.170307] clk_core_set_parent_nolock+0x1d4/0x508
> >>
> >> [ 2.175190] clk_hw_set_parent+0x1c/0x28
> >>
> >> [ 2.179114] imx8mq_clocks_probe+0x3538/0x3668
> >>
> >> [ 2.183562] platform_drv_probe+0x58/0xa8
> >>
> >> [ 2.187573] really_probe+0xe0/0x440
> >>
> >>
> >> [ 2.191145] driver_probe_device+0xe4/0x138
> >> [ 2.195333] device_driver_attach+0x74/0x80
> >>
> >>
> >> [ 2.199519] __driver_attach+0xa8/0x170
> >>
> >> [ 2.203354] bus_for_each_dev+0x74/0xc8
> >>
> >>
> >> [ 2.207190] driver_attach+0x28/0x30
> >>
> >> [ 2.210767] bus_add_driver+0x144/0x228
> >>
> >>
> >> [ 2.214605] driver_register+0x68/0x118
> >>
> >> [ 2.218438] __platform_driver_register+0x4c/0x58
> >>
> >>
> >> [ 2.223151] imx8mq_clk_driver_init+0x20/0x28
> >>
> >> [ 2.227511] do_one_initcall+0x88/0x410
> >>
> >> [ 2.231348] kernel_init_freeable+0x24c/0x2c0
> >>
> >> [ 2.235706] kernel_init+0x18/0x108
> >>
> >> [ 2.239192] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
> >>
> >> [ 2.242768] irq event stamp: 130084
> >>
> >> [ 2.246262] hardirqs last enabled at (130083): [<ffff800010302e78>]
> >> __slab_alloc.isra.0+0x90/0xb8
> >> [ 2.255241] hardirqs last disabled at (130084): [<ffff8000100a60b0>]
> >> do_debug_exception+0x168/0x254
> >> [ 2.264308] softirqs last enabled at (130070): [<ffff800010080e88>]
> >> __do_softirq+0x490/0x56c
> >> [ 2.272856] softirqs last disabled at (130057): [<ffff800010101e1c>]
> >> irq_exit+0x11c/0x148
> >> [ 2.281057] ---[ end trace 1fae73b5c77d8120 ]---
> >> [ 2.285792] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> >
> > I not met such warning when I test, you enabled lockdep debug?
> >
> >>
> >> This happens because clk_hw_set_parent does not take the prepare_lock
> >> so a lockdep_assert_held fails. In practice it should be mostly
> >> harmless because clk operations shouldn't happen while the SOC provider
> is probing.
> >>
> >> The issue can be worked around by doing the following instead:
> >>
> >> + clk_set_parent(hws[IMX8MQ_CLK_A53_SRC]->clk,
> >> hws[IMX8MQ_SYS1_PLL_800M]->clk);
> >> + clk_set_parent(hws[IMX8MQ_CLK_A53_CORE]->clk,
> >> hws[IMX8MQ_ARM_PLL_OUT]->clk);
> >>
> >> This implies reverting commit f95d58981f40 ("clk: imx: Include
> >> clk-provider.h instead of clk.h for i.MX8M SoCs clock driver") and
> >> somewhat rolls back the consumer/provider split.
> >>
> >> What would be a clean fix for this? It might make sense to add a new API.
> >>
> >
> > How about moving this to dts? I'll give a try.
>
> The warning spam still happens in next-20200325.
Please help try https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11433775/
Thanks,
Peng.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists