[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200325122949.GW13183@mellanox.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 09:29:49 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Cc: mst@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
maxime.coquelin@...hat.com, cunming.liang@...el.com,
zhihong.wang@...el.com, rob.miller@...adcom.com,
xiao.w.wang@...el.com, lingshan.zhu@...el.com, eperezma@...hat.com,
lulu@...hat.com, parav@...lanox.com, kevin.tian@...el.com,
stefanha@...hat.com, rdunlap@...radead.org, hch@...radead.org,
aadam@...hat.com, jiri@...lanox.com, shahafs@...lanox.com,
hanand@...inx.com, mhabets@...arflare.com, gdawar@...inx.com,
saugatm@...inx.com, vmireyno@...vell.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 5/9] vDPA: introduce vDPA bus
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 04:27:07PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> +struct vdpa_device *__vdpa_alloc_device(struct device *parent,
> + const struct vdpa_config_ops *config,
> + size_t size);
> +
> +#define vdpa_alloc_device(dev_struct, member, parent, config) \
> + container_of(__vdpa_alloc_device( \
> + parent, config, \
> + sizeof(struct dev_struct) + \
> + BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(offsetof( \
> + struct dev_struct, member))), \
> + struct dev_struct, member)
This all looks robust now, one minor remark is to not do 'struct
dev_struct' here so the caller has to do
vdpa_alloc_device(struct foo, vpda, ...)
Which suggests to the reader something unusual is happening
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists