linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] KVM: SVM: Move and split up svm.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200325123112.GB18178@8bytes.org>
Date:   Wed, 25 Mar 2020 13:31:12 +0100
From:   Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To:     Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
Cc:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        Ashish Kalra <Ashish.Kalra@....com>,
        Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] KVM: SVM: Move and split up svm.c

On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 11:30:07AM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> What are people's thoughts on using "arch/x86/kvm/{amd,intel}" instead of
> "arch/x86/kvm/{svm,vmx}"?  Maybe this won't be an issue for AMD/SVM, but on
> the Intel/VMX side, there is stuff in the pipeline that makes using "vmx"
> for the sub-directory quite awkward.  I wasn't planning on proposing the
> rename (from vmx->intel) until I could justify _why_, but perhaps it makes
> sense to bundle all the pain of a reorganizing code into a single kernel
> version?

I am fine either way, naming the directory amd/ or svm/ doesn't make a
big difference.

Regards,

	Joerg