[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f25a42bd-6d59-6b5c-5e32-8c7d73161373@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 10:20:51 +0800
From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <chao@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] f2fs: remove redundant compress inode check
On 2020/3/25 10:17, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 03/25, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2020/3/24 23:43, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>> On 03/24, Chao Yu wrote:
>>>> Jaegeuk,
>>>>
>>>> Missed to apply this patch?
>>>>
>>>> On 2020/2/29 18:49, Chao Yu wrote:
>>>>> due to f2fs_post_read_required() has did that.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 2 --
>>>>> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>>>>> index f4bcbbd5e9ed..882f9ad3445b 100644
>>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>>>>> @@ -4006,8 +4006,6 @@ static inline bool f2fs_force_buffered_io(struct inode *inode,
>>>>> return true;
>>>>> if (f2fs_is_multi_device(sbi))
>>>>> return true;
>>>>> - if (f2fs_compressed_file(inode))
>>>>> - return true;
>>>
>>> I thought that we can keep this to avoid any confusion when porting to old
>>> production kernel which uses ICE.
>>
>> That old kernel w/ ICE doesn't have f2fs_post_read_required(), right?
>
> We do have.
Well, so I didn't catch your point why we will confuse. :P
>
>>
>> I thought we backport features with order of the time fsverity/compression
>> feature was introduced, then f2fs_post_read_required() should be there
>> when we backport compression feature.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>>
>>>>> /*
>>>>> * for blkzoned device, fallback direct IO to buffered IO, so
>>>>> * all IOs can be serialized by log-structured write.
>>>>>
>>> .
>>>
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists