[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <777D8DAA-F462-4E8D-9012-C114DE6D56DE@flygoat.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 23:09:10 +0800
From: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>
To: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
CC: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
Huacai Chen <chenhc@...ote.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Allison Randal <allison@...utok.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 06/11] irqchip: mips-cpu: Convert to simple domain
于 2020年3月25日 GMT+08:00 下午11:04:37, Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de> 写到:
>On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 10:31:21PM +0800, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
>>
>>
>> 于 2020年3月25日 GMT+08:00 下午10:15:16, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org> 写到:
>> >On 2020-03-25 13:59, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
>> >
>> >[...]
>> >
>> >>>> So probably we can use legacy domain when MIPS IRQ BASE is in
>the
>> >>>> range of legacy IRQ
>> >>>> and switch to simple domain when it's not in that range?
>> >>>
>> >>> No, see below.
>> >>>
>> >>>> Here in Loongson systems IRQ 0-15 is occupied by I8259 so I did
>> >this
>> >>>> hack.
>> >>>
>> >>> Well, if you have to consider which Linux IRQ gets assigned,
>> >>> then your platform is definitely not ready for non-legacy
>> >>> irqdomains. Just stick to legacy for now until you have removed
>> >>> all the code that knows the hwirq mapping.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks.
>> >>
>> >> So I have to allocate irq_desc here in driver manually?
>> >
>> >No, you are probably better off just dropping this patch, as MIPS
>> >doesn't seem to be ready for a wholesale switch to virtual
>interrupts.
>>
>> It can't work without this patch.
>>
>> Legacy domain require IRQ number within 0-15
>> however it's already occupied by i8259 or "HTPIC" driver.
>
>what's the problem here ? AFAIK there could be more than one
>legacy domain, at least that's what at least IP22/SNI in MIPS world
>are doing.
MIPS_IRQ_BASE must be higher than 15, otherwise it will conflict with i8259.
However we have only preallocated irq_desc for 0-15.
And legacy domain require irq_desc being preallocated.
>
>Thomas.
--
Jiaxun Yang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists